AD FIELD NOTESAI advertising · the work behind the output

Case files / ai assisted film production

Campari Fellini Forward: treat a director's archive as a constraint, not a ghostwriter

Campari and Wunderman Thompson analysed Fellini material to build scriptwriting and previsualisation tools for a new short film, while the production team retained the final choices.

Campaign period: 2022Source published: Date not statedArchive entry prepared: 15 September 2026

Retrospective coverage, prepared in September 2026 from the original record.

Woman in a red dress sits at a bar with a Campari drink.
Campaign still from Campari’s Fellini Forward case. Campari Group / Wunderman Thompson; image published by WPP.

Reported execution: analysis fed a new film

WPP says Fellini Forward used AI tools to extract patterns in Federico Fellini transcripts and analyse his repertoire, camera movement and facial emotion. Wunderman Thompson then built scriptwriting and previsualisation tools around those learnings for Campari. The agency says original crew members were consulted and that the team could accept or amend machine suggestions while constructing the final script.

That division of labour matters. The public case does not describe an old director being resurrected by a system; it describes a new production using archival analysis as a structured creative input.

Our reading: the archive is a responsibility

A named artist's style creates a powerful shorthand, but it can turn a production into an imitation contest. The more useful question is which characteristics can inform a new work without claiming authorship for someone who cannot approve it. Consultation, transparent framing and a live human decision point are not decorative safeguards here.

For a similar brief, define what the model may propose and what it may not settle. Put the source material, rights position and expert review into the production plan before a generated suggestion becomes a finished scene.

Evidence boundary: cultural attention is not a controlled result

WPP reports press attention, awards and impressions, but the public page does not offer a control that isolates the AI-assisted process from Campari, the Fellini association, distribution or conventional production craft.

The case supports a narrower conclusion: archival analysis can be used to structure an original brand film when human authorship and editorial responsibility remain explicit. It cannot validate a claim that a model has recovered a filmmaker’s intent.

Sources & limits

WPP agency case study; its press and impression figures are reported campaign outcomes, not an independent effectiveness audit.

  1. WPP — Campari Group’s Fellini Forward — source publication date not stated.

Send a correction with the passage and supporting source.

The weekly field note

One useful note for the next brief.

Campaigns worth studying, the work behind them, and questions to bring into your next creative review. Delivered weekly.

How we handle your email