AD FIELD NOTESAI advertising · the work behind the output

Case files / generative advertising

IBM What If?: use generative work to explain an AI platform

Ogilvy’s What If? campaign used generative AI in Masters-related print and highlight commentary alongside films about IBM co-created solutions.

Campaign period: 2024Source published: Date not statedArchive entry prepared: 15 September 2026

Retrospective coverage, prepared in September 2026 from the original record.

An upside-down cityscape appears above a bright horizon in IBM campaign artwork.
IBM What If? campaign image published by Ogilvy. IBM / Ogilvy; image published by Ogilvy.

Reported execution

Ogilvy says What If? used question-mark imagery, four films and generative-AI-assisted Masters print work including highlight commentary to illustrate IBM’s co-creation proposition.

Our reading

The campaign wisely treats AI as one component of an enterprise story rather than proof that a generated image solves a business problem. The question becomes a useful frame for human decisions around the system.

Production and evidence limits

Sports commentary needs clear provenance and rights controls, while enterprise claims require technical review. Ogilvy’s page establishes the creative use, not accuracy, audience understanding or platform adoption caused by it.

Sources & limits

Ogilvy agency case study; it documents execution, not a comparative effectiveness study.

  1. Ogilvy — What If? IBM — source publication date not stated.

Send a correction with the passage and supporting source.

The weekly field note

One useful note for the next brief.

Campaigns worth studying, the work behind them, and questions to bring into your next creative review. Delivered weekly.

How we handle your email