AD FIELD NOTESAI advertising · the work behind the output

Research library / September 2026 notebook

What the record cannot tell us

Why a campaign archive should preserve its gaps instead of filling them with confidence.

The website should store each record as structured data with these fields:

case_id
project_name
brand
agency / production / artist
country / market
year
medium
ai_role
human_contribution
creative_objective
production_process
distribution
audience
reported_outcome
outcome_evidence_type
criticism_or_controversy
creative_lesson
source_urls[]
source_dates[]
image_url_or_local_filename
creator / title / date / license
rights_status
disclosure_status
last_verified
editorial_owner

Source limitations to show in the UI:

  • A brand press release can verify that the brand says it launched a campaign, but it may not verify independent effectiveness.
  • An agency case study can explain a creative process and report outcomes, but it may omit failures, spend, or comparison groups.
  • An award entry is optimized to persuade jurors and often compresses methodology.
  • A vendor case study may show a real customer and a real result but is not a neutral benchmark.
  • Academic evidence may study a task such as writing, support, or coding rather than a full advertising campaign.
  • Tool terms describe the provider’s rights and limits; they do not clear third-party inputs, likeness, music, or claims.

Follow the evidence

This chapter comes from the September research notebook. Linked sources and qualifications remain attached to the claims.

Open all sources and footnotes →

The weekly field note

One useful note for the next brief.

Campaigns worth studying, the work behind them, and questions to bring into your next creative review. Delivered weekly.

How we handle your email